Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1588

reference
294-tree-1
name
1588
tree-preservation-order

undefined

294-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.040895 50.897847)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.040824 50.897839,-1.040827 50.897853,-1.040837 50.897866,-1.040853 50.897876,-1.040872 50.897882,-1.040894 50.897885,-1.040916 50.897883,-1.040936 50.897876,-1.040952 50.897867,-1.040963 50.897854,-1.040966 50.897840,-1.040963 50.897826,-1.040953 50.897814,-1.040938 50.897804,-1.040918 50.897797,-1.040896 50.897795,-1.040874 50.897797,-1.040854 50.897803,-1.040838 50.897813,-1.040828 50.897825,-1.040824 50.897839)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL